AI Verdict
MSFT has stronger fundamentals based on our AI analysis.
COST vs MSFT Fundamental Comparison
| Metric | COST | MSFT |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $207.4B | $241.8B |
| Net Income | $6.2B | $98.0B |
| Net Margin | 3.0% | 40.5% |
| ROE | 18.6% | 23.6% |
| ROA | 7.2% | 14.1% |
| Current Ratio | 1.07x | 1.28x |
| Debt/Equity | 0.17x | 0.10x |
| EPS | $14.01 | $13.14 |
Green = Better metric | Red = Weaker metric
You Might Also Compare
COST vs MSFT: Frequently Asked Questions
Is COST or MSFT the better stock in 2026?
Based on dual AI fundamental analysis (Claude and ChatGPT), MSFT has stronger fundamentals. COST is graded A (80% confidence) while MSFT is graded A (91% confidence). This is not investment advice.
How does COST compare to MSFT fundamentally?
COSTCO WHOLESALE CORP /NEW has ROE of 18.6% vs MICROSOFT CORP's 23.6%. Net margins are 3.0% vs 40.5% respectively.
Which stock pays higher dividends, COST or MSFT?
COST has a dividend yield of N/A or no dividend while MSFT has N/A or no dividend. Check individual stock pages for detailed dividend history and payout ratios.
Should I invest in COST or MSFT for long term?
For long-term investing, consider that COST has a A grade with 80% confidence, while MSFT has a A grade with 91% confidence. Higher confidence indicates more consistent fundamentals from SEC filings. This is not investment advice - always do your own research.
What do the AI models say about COST vs MSFT?
Our dual AI system (Claude by Anthropic and ChatGPT by OpenAI) analyzes SEC 10-K and 10-Q filings independently. For COST vs MSFT, the AI consensus favors MSFT based on fundamental metrics including revenue growth, profitability, ROE, and balance sheet strength.