AI Verdict
Both stocks have similar AI ratings. Review detailed metrics below.
COST vs PG Fundamental Comparison
| Metric | COST | PG |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $207.4B | $65.8B |
| Net Income | $6.2B | $13.0B |
| Net Margin | 3.0% | 19.8% |
| ROE | 18.6% | 23.8% |
| ROA | 7.2% | 10.1% |
| Current Ratio | 1.07x | 0.73x |
| Debt/Equity | 0.17x | 0.44x |
| EPS | $14.01 | $5.36 |
Green = Better metric | Red = Weaker metric
You Might Also Compare
COST vs PG: Frequently Asked Questions
Is COST or PG the better stock in 2026?
Based on dual AI fundamental analysis (Claude and ChatGPT), both stocks have similar ratings. COST is graded A (80% confidence) while PG is graded A (80% confidence). This is not investment advice.
How does COST compare to PG fundamentally?
COSTCO WHOLESALE CORP /NEW has ROE of 18.6% vs PROCTER & GAMBLE Co's 23.8%. Net margins are 3.0% vs 19.8% respectively.
Which stock pays higher dividends, COST or PG?
COST has a dividend yield of N/A or no dividend while PG has N/A or no dividend. Check individual stock pages for detailed dividend history and payout ratios.
Should I invest in COST or PG for long term?
For long-term investing, consider that COST has a A grade with 80% confidence, while PG has a A grade with 80% confidence. Higher confidence indicates more consistent fundamentals from SEC filings. This is not investment advice - always do your own research.
What do the AI models say about COST vs PG?
Our dual AI system (Claude by Anthropic and ChatGPT by OpenAI) analyzes SEC 10-K and 10-Q filings independently. For COST vs PG, both AIs rate them similarly based on fundamental metrics including revenue growth, profitability, ROE, and balance sheet strength.