AI Verdict
COST has stronger fundamentals based on our AI analysis.
COST vs MCD Fundamental Comparison
| Metric | COST | MCD |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $207.4B | $6.5B |
| Net Income | $6.2B | $2.0B |
| Net Margin | 3.0% | 30.4% |
| ROE | 18.6% | N/A |
| ROA | 7.2% | 3.3% |
| Current Ratio | 1.07x | 1.14x |
| Debt/Equity | 0.17x | N/A |
| EPS | $14.01 | $2.78 |
Green = Better metric | Red = Weaker metric
You Might Also Compare
COST vs MCD: Frequently Asked Questions
Is COST or MCD the better stock in 2026?
Based on dual AI fundamental analysis (Claude and ChatGPT), COST has stronger fundamentals. COST is graded A (80% confidence) while MCD is graded A (76% confidence). This is not investment advice.
How does COST compare to MCD fundamentally?
COSTCO WHOLESALE CORP /NEW has ROE of 18.6% vs MCDONALDS CORP's N/A. Net margins are 3.0% vs 30.4% respectively.
Which stock pays higher dividends, COST or MCD?
COST has a dividend yield of N/A or no dividend while MCD has N/A or no dividend. Check individual stock pages for detailed dividend history and payout ratios.
Should I invest in COST or MCD for long term?
For long-term investing, consider that COST has a A grade with 80% confidence, while MCD has a A grade with 76% confidence. Higher confidence indicates more consistent fundamentals from SEC filings. This is not investment advice - always do your own research.
What do the AI models say about COST vs MCD?
Our dual AI system (Claude by Anthropic and ChatGPT by OpenAI) analyzes SEC 10-K and 10-Q filings independently. For COST vs MCD, the AI consensus favors COST based on fundamental metrics including revenue growth, profitability, ROE, and balance sheet strength.